NJ Court Expands OPRA Access to Settlements Involving Public Entities
In Evening Journal Ass'n v. City of Bayonne & Robert F. Sloan, a New Jersey judge held that sealed settlements involving public entities may be subject to disclosure under the state’s Open Public Records Act (OPRA). Facts of the Case
The OPRA case sprung from a civil lawsuit filed against the City of Bayonne and several of its police officers in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The suit alleged that the police used excessive force to restrain Brandon Walsh and that they assaulted members of his family, including two minors and a disabled person, by dousing them with pepper spray. The parties ultimately settled the suit.
On March 27, 2017, the Jersey Journalsent Bayonne an OPRA request for "the terms of the settlement agreement between Brandon Walsh & Kathy Walsh and the Bayonne Police Department - civil action No. 2:14-cv-7186." Bayonne denied the request, citing (among other reasons) that it was sealed under a federal court order.
The Evening Journal Association, which publishes the Jersey Journal, filed suit. It contended that Bayonne's refusal to provide the settlement agreement violated OPRA and the common law right of access to public records. The Evening Journal Association asked the court to determine that: Bayonne's refusal to release the settlement agreement was illegal; to compel Bayonne to release the agreement; to pay plaintiff's legal fees and costs; and to pay a civil penalty under N.J.S.A. 47:1A-11.
NJ Court’s Decision
The court granted the plaintiff's OPRA request for the federal court settlement documents. “This court holds that when a settlement with a New Jersey public entity is made in another jurisdiction that the settlement documents shall inform the parties and the court in that jurisdiction that the settlement may be subject to disclosure under OPRA,” Hudson County Superior Court Judge Daniel D’Alessandro wrote.
In reaching his decision, Judge D’Alessandro highlighted that “[t]here is no identical case law to guide the court's analysis when a settlement is sealed by a federal court order.” However, he emphasized that public policy considerations strongly favored disclosure.
“A government entity cannot shield itself from public scrutiny by rotely sealing settlements,” the judge wrote. “The public has a right to know that settlements are not borne of reckless judgment, collusion, conflicts of interest or corruption.”
In light of the court’s decision, New Jersey municipalities should be aware that settlements in “another” jurisdiction, including federal court, may be subject to OPRA. In addition, such a settlement should inform the court and the parties accordingly.
For more information about the court’s decision in Evening Journal Ass'n v. City of Bayonne & Robert F. Sloanor the legal issues involved, we encourage you to contact a member of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Government Law Group.
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently clarified when police internal affairs (IA) reports must be disclosed to the public under both the Open Public Records Act (OPRA) and the common…
The Supreme Court of New Jersey recently upheld Attorney General Gurbir Grewal’s executive order to publish the names of police officers who have been subjected to major discipline... The Supreme…
The Appellate Division recently held that police internal affairs files were not subject to disclosure under the state’s Open Public Records Act (OPRA)… In Gannett Satellite Information Network, LLC v.…
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently held in Golden v. New Jersey Inst. of Tech. that an author was wrongly denied fees under the New Jersey Open Public Records Act…
In L.R. v. Camden City Public School District,the Supreme Court of New Jersey addressed the extent to which school districts must provide information to requestors on settlement agreements with parents of special…
In Libertarians For Transparent Government v. Ocean County Prosecutor’s Office, the Appellate Division held that the state’s Open Public Records Act (OPRA) does not require a covered entity to provide…
The New Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (NJSPCA) must comply with the state’s Open Public Records Act, according to the Appellate Division. The decision in Wronko…
As we reflect on the New Year, we are looking back at the public law issues that impacted New Jersey municipalities in 2017. The past year brought a number of…
Donald Scarinci
Manage Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.