The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey recently ruled that Seaside Park may not withdraw from the Central Regional School District. The case provides a comprehensive overview of regional school funding as well as the legal process for dissolving or withdrawing from a regional school district. The
The Supreme Court of New Jersey recently ruled in the case of Ten Stary Dom Partnership v. Mauro, that the Borough of Bay Head’s planning board improperly denied a landowner’s request for a bulk zoning variance to build a one family home. The Court found that the board placed too
In TSI East Brunswick, L.L.C. v. Zoning Bd. of Adjustment of Twp. of East Brunswick, the Supreme Court of New Jersey considered the standard of proof required for securing a variance for a conditional use. The court concluded that applicants are not required to prove the negative criteria by an
The New Jersey municipality of Mount Holly will take center stage before the U.S. Supreme Court next term. The justices have agreed to consider Mount Holly v. Mount Holly Gardens Citizens in Action, which centers on whether disparate impact claims can be brought under the Fair Housing Act. The Fair
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of New Jersey issued yet another decision regarding the state’s controversial affordable housing program. By a vote of 5-2, the panel held that Gov. Chris Christie’s attempt to abolish the Council on Affordable Housing (COAH) exceeded his authority. As previously discussed on the Scarinci
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently clarified whether an application for a use variance based on the assertion that the site is “particularly suitable for the proposed use” requires proof that the project must be built on that site because it is the only one available. The issue arose because
A recent United States Supreme Court decision clarifies a key area of administrative law while also providing telecommunications providers with potential grounds to argue that a municipality is not promptly reviewing development applications for telecommunication facilities. In City of Arlington, Texas v. Federal Communications Commission, No. 11-1545 (May 20, 2013), the
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently considered what happens when more than one entity plays a role in handling a property’s sewage. The court concluded that both entities were entitled to collect a non-duplicative sewer connection fee. The Facts of the Case Under the New Jersey Sewerage Authorities Law, N.J.S.A.
